![]() > this work to our satisfaction using a different compiler (that is, in > will understand if you look at the big picture, but if anyone can make Just now it is not a priority for us, which I trust you > find anything which could be done with the development resources > We have invested some time looking for a solution to this, but did not > Good point ! your link gives some answer though : It would be helpull insight if those librairies, licenses could be cleary identified and is a fork, but what is the significant difference(s) with the Original ?Įssentially they don't seem to value enough the freedom of the software Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.īut as you mentioned vita_cell Oracle VM is Licensed under GPLV2 (guest additions too) this leads to confusion.Īssuming Open Watcom compiles non-free librairies, thus opening the door to a malware binary(ies) as an executable program code which could contain data, instructions for malicious malware program to run in your OS. ![]() The FSF mentions Open Watcom on under the Practical Differences between Free Software and Open Source paragraph as For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a modified version and using it privately. 'Open'Watcom' page about says that in the first half of 2002, the source was finally made available under the Sybase Open Watcom Public License, version 1.0. ![]() What is the reason they call it as "open" watcom? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |